View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Standard & Regulation Management Conference & Report Maintenance & Sustainment Protection & Prevention Research Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 AS50881 FAR High Voltage FAR 25.1707 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) AS4373 Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
25.1701 25.1703 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems Aircraft Power System Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) arc damage Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM F2799 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conductors conduit Connector connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating diagnostic dielectric constant Distributed Power System DO-160 dynamic cut through Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling ethernet EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech Green Taxiing Grounding Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation ICAs IEC60172 IEEE Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Insulation insulation resistance IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab Kapton Laser Marking life limited parts life projection Lightning Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel measurement Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 Military 5088 modeling MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 No Fault Found off gassing Outgassing Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Rewiring Project Risk Assessment SAE Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure Shield Shielding signal cable silver plated wire smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards stored energy supportability Sustainment Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Shock Thermal Testing Tin plated conductors Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs USAF verification Visual Inspection voltage white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code

All components wear out over time, but the rate at which they degrade will vary depending on the quality of the product, how is it handled, and the environmental conditions in which the component is installed. To consider all the potential ways that an EWIS can fail, it can be overwhelming. As a brief list let us consider the following:

Connectors Wire
Shell corrosion Broken conductor
Contact wear Excessive mechanical flexing
Contact corrosion Fluid exposure
Contact retention failure Poor routing
Dielectric breakdown Overcurrent
Fluid ingress Tight bend weakening insulation
Bend pin Crushed by equipment
Worn contacts Abrasion during operation
Contact- Wire Interface Cut
Corrosion Poor shield termination
Poor crimp/soldering Noise on line
Not sufficient contact area Crosstalk
Poor stripping of the wire Generated EMI
Improper sizing of wire with contact  
Unmatched impedance  
Unmatched metal type  
worn contacts
[Top] The connector is clean and shows no signs of corrosion or damage to the contacts. [Bottom] A closeup examination of the photo shows gold flaking from the contacts on the interfacial seal. Source MIL-HDBK-522 Rev A

So how do you identify these and make sure you do not send off an aircraft with problems? The following runs through several of these potential failure modes, what they look like, and what can be done to address them

Contact Wear

Connector contacts are the terminations of pins and sockets for wires that are inserted into connectors. These contacts, which may be soldered or crimped, can have a variety of substrate materials plated with one of a couple of materials. When the contacts are mated, the pins and sockets rub against each other and progressively, wear down the plating. As more of the plating is worn down, the contact quality may be reduced, corrosion becomes more likely, and circuit performance is diminished.

Depending on the type of contacts that are used, they may be tested and have verified performance up to 500 mating/demating cycles before the contacts begin to wear. What does wear look like? Physically, the wear on contacts will dull the plating materials or exposure of the substrate. Depending on the environment, this may be exacerbated by environmental factors and cause corrosion.

There are a couple of ways that one might find this in an application. First, visual observation during maintenance actions. Without a doubt, this will be harder for higher density connectors (those with a greater number of contacts) and very difficult to observe on sockets. This means that all or most of the visual evidence will come from the visual examination of the pins.

worn contacts
[Top] The connector is clean and shows no signs of corrosion or damage to the contacts. [Bottom] A closeup examination of the photo shows gold flaking from the contacts on the interfacial seal. Source MIL-HDBK-522 Rev A

Note: The application of Corrosion Preventative Compounds (CPCs) into connectors is not recommended. While this may provide a short-term benefit, ultimately this will add contaminants into the connector and reduce circuit performance.

The other means of detecting contact wear is with higher than expected voltage drop or resistance in a circuit. Only after there is significant corrosion or wear is this detectable with a handheld multimeter. Systems like Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR), can help to identify the mismatched impedance. Further, testing the circuit with higher current loads (still within the wire and contact rating) can be used to identify corrosion in the circuit

Connector Corrosion

Connector corrosion can be amongst the easiest degradation methods to detect in an EWIS. The early stages of corrosion may not be obvious, but once it has taken hold it can rapidly expand on the connector. There are several means by which corrosion can initiate on a connector; physical damage, poor plating, contact with fluids that damage or erode the plating are among several possibilities.

worn contacts
[Top] The connector looks new and is without any signs of corrosion. [Middle] The corrector shows significant corrosion to the point that the mechanical strength has been diminished. [Bottom] Visible corrosion inside and outside the connector. Source MIL-HDBK-522 Rev A

A question that is sometimes asked is if the surface of the connector is corroded but the mechanical strength is not compromised and the circuits are still fully functional, is it necessary to change the connector? The answer is dependent on the extent of corrosion. Connectors are designed to be disconnected, and if the corrosion extends to a point where demating may be impacted, then the connector should be replaced. Replacement is often the most effective solution as alternatives like cleaning and protecting will often not solve the underlying issue with the exposed connector substrate. Furthermore, if this is a repeat issue, then it may be necessary to approach the issue with a mitigation approach or design change mindset.

Upcoming Article

Future articles will address several other means of EWIS component failure. Having an issue with your EWIS? Lectromec’s testing, certification, and/or inspection services are ready to help.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. Michael has an FAA DER appointment with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification.