View Latest Blog Entries
Close
Categories
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Management Standard & Regulation Conference & Report Maintenance & Sustainment Protection & Prevention Research Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 AS50881 FAR High Voltage FAR 25.1707 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage FAR 25.1709
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
25.1701 25.1703 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems Aircraft Power System Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) arc damage Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM F2799 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conduit Connector connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating diagnostic dielectric constant Distributed Power System DO-160 Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling ethernet EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech Green Taxiing Grounding Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation ICAs IEC60172 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Insulation insulation resistance IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab Kapton Laser Marking life limited parts life projection Lightning Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 Military 5088 modeling MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 No Fault Found off gassing Outgassing Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Rewiring Project Risk Assessment SAE Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure Shield Shielding signal cable silver plated wire smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice stored energy supportability Sustainment Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Shock Thermal Testing Tin plated conductors Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs verification Visual Inspection voltage white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification work unit code

Latest update from the October 2014 SAE Wire Committee Meeting

Conference & Report

The meeting for the SAE Fall 2014 8A and 8D groups covered a lot of ground and developments in the aerospace wire and cable world. The SAE Wire Committee Meeting, held in Tempe, Arizona, consisted of three days of meetings, presentations and task group reports. Here are some of the developments from the SAE meeting.

UAS Are Not All on Their Own

The task group was formed at the 2014 April meeting to evaluate the specific needs of Unmanned Aerial Systems (often called UAVs or drones). The task group examined the current AS50881 installation standard and determined what parts of the requirements document could not be implemented for UASs and if it would be necessary to develop a new wiring installation standard written specifically for UASs. This group included representation from UAS producers, aircraft original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), industry, and the FAA. After review, it was determined that 70-80% of the requirements outlined in AS50881 were achievable. This is fairly close to the compliance rate of many aircraft OEMs.

Because of this high level of compliance, the task group recommended that the UASs use the AS50881. For those looking to produce UASs, the current guidance outlined in AS50881 is the place to start when developing system design documents.

SAE Wire Committee
Lovely Phoenix, the site of the Oct 2014 SAE 8A and 8D committees

CPCs and the Health of Wires

Research performed under a joint FAA-USAF effort looked into the impact of corrosion prevention compounds (CPCs) on aircraft wiring. The main factor evaluated was the impact on wire flammability. This sought to determine if the structural or electronics grade CPCs sprayed on and in aircraft affected the wires’ airworthiness (flamability and CPCs).

The flammability testing performed at the FAA showed that some CPCs had a significant negative impact on flammability.

The standard flammability test called out in AS4373 was the method used for assessment. For those unfamiliar with this standard, the wire is held at a 60 degree angle from a horizontal position and exposed to a flame (find out more about flamability testing). Several of the samples with CPCs dramatically failed. The failures were often dramatic and caused significant damage to the sample.

It is because of this and other research that the SAE-8A committee took action and approved adding language to the AS50881, disallowing the application of CPCs to wire, cables, and protective sleeving. The application of CPCs to connector back shells is still permitted.

Arc Damage Update

If you recall from the last SAE update, the 8A\D groups were looking into developing recommendations for arc damage assessments. The guidance document would provide a basis upon which wire separation distances could be defined.

The review of the existing procedures that have been proposed provide good methods for determining the safe separation distances, but they require additional work that will eventually become an Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP).

One item that came from the meeting is that the recommendations from the arc damage have to go beyond just the wire group and must be coordinated with the power systems committee. The reason is that the power systems used in the testing have a tremendous impact on the necessary separation distances. Furthermore, the development of solid state protection devices and arc fault circuit breakers have made a significant impact on arc damage separation distances.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. In September 2014, Michael was appointed as an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification.