View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Management Standard & Regulation Research Protection & Prevention Conference & Report Maintenance & Sustainment Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 FAR AS50881 FAR 25.1707 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Wire System High Voltage FAR 25.1709 Degradation Circuit Protection
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
25.1703 Accelerated Aging Aging Systems Aircraft Power System Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Damage AS22759/87 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM F2799 Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice Cable cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker Circuit Protection Coaxial cable comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Conductor Connector connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating Distributed Power System DO-160 Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life Energy Storage Environmental Environmental Cycling ethernet EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech Green Taxiing Grounding Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink tubing high speed data cable High Voltage Hot Stamping Humidity Variation Insulation insulation resistance IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab Laser Marking life limited parts life projection Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 Military 5088 modeling MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 No Fault Found off gassing Outgassing Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Performance Physical Testing Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet Power systems predictive maintenance Probability of Failure Product Quality Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) relays Reliability Research Rewiring Project Risk Assessment SAE Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure Shield Shielding Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires supportability Sustainment Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Shock Thermal Testing Tin plated conductors Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs verification Visual Inspection white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Certification Wire Comparison Wire System wire testing Wire Verification

Shield Grounding and EMI Protection

Protection & Prevention

The push for more electric aircraft is driven by weight savings and the availability of reliable electrical components. This is made possible with greater power generating capacity, however, this comes with an increased challenge of ensuring reliable data transmission. More power flowing through the aircraft means higher levels of electromagnetic interference (EMI).

Aerospace environmental test standards like DO-160 identify several ways on how to evaluate electrical device performance. Typically, the testing is done at the device or system level, but considerations must be made for the electrical wiring interconnect system (EWIS). If the wiring system shielding is not handled properly, the performance of the expensive LRU will be degraded or rendered useless.

In this article, we review guidance from US military standard MIL-STD-464, Electromagnetic Environmental Effects Requirements for Systems, for the grounding of EWIS components to achieve the best performance possible.


Electromagnetic interference (EMI) is caused by a variety of sources (power wires, transmitters, devices) and can induce unwanted signals into sensitive aircraft wiring. The interference may come from devices connected to the circuit creating power distortions (such as common impedance coupling), or from external circuit elements (such as radiated fields). Whichever way the EMI enters a circuit, impact can range from lost communications, instrumentation anomalies, and unplanned control movements.

In practice, a signal wire may be protected by a conductive metal mesh or tape wrapped to form an EMI shield. For sensitive circuits, a harness in which the wire/cable is routed may also be shielded. On the surface, this may seem straight forward: use a shielded wire/harness and achieve EMI protection. In practice, this is a detail heavy task that requires proper equipment, installation, and maintenance. To highlight the complexity, the Navy’s installation and repair practices manual, 01-1A-505, devotes 35 pages to the proper methods for terminating shielded wires/cables.

Common Failure Point

A common area for EMI susceptibility is the wiring harness shield-ground interface. If not terminated properly, the gap between shield terminations and connectors creates a window through which external EMI can penetrate. This may be mitigated using a conductive backshell or overbraid connected (also referred to as solder sleeves e.g. M83519) to the grounded connector shell. For this to be effective, the connector housings, the backshell accessories, and shield overbraids must provide a low-impedance path to the metal airframe.

EMI Protection Assessment
What is the effectiveness of an EMI protection scheme? Find out the best one for your application – contact Lectromec.

Identification of shielding issues can be done with the use of a resistance meter capable of measuring milliohms. In this evaluation, the harness is disconnected at both ends and a low DC voltage is placed on the shield; this becomes a more complicated task with branching wire harnesses. Good shielding terminations should have a resistance value in the milliohm range. A high resistance measurement is relative and could be anything higher than 15mΩ; the value is system and configuration dependent.

While a resistance measurement can help to find issues, it is important to know where the issue may exist. As a means of identifying damage, time domain reflectometers (TDR) can be used to locate discontinuities or changes in protection schemes. This does provide the best means of determining performance changes with comparisons is earlier (baseline) measurements. Variations between the two datasets can help with proactive troubleshooting.

A reason for the use of cable shield testers is their ability to perform a more thorough evaluation of shield or conduit performance. In some cases, cables pass through bulkheads without the use of connectors and access is not readily available. Further, given that shields are typically obscured or under additional materials, inspection is often limited to electrical verification. If an electrical connector is sufficiently accessible, the voltage measurement is straightforward.

How much damage is too much?

It is important to note that research examining cable/harnesses shielding and the impact of defects has found that holes or small defects in the shields themselves are not a significant problem. To have a significant impact on performance, major shield damage is necessary for EMI shield degradation. Unfortunately, there is not a single go/no-go standard for shield damage as the environment, installation, and system performance are all unique.

Next Article

This is only a starting point for EWIS EMI considerations and addressing the needs of electromagnetic compatibility. The next article in this series will cover in-service aircraft evaluations of EWIS shielding and means to improve the performance of shielding performance. Addressing EMI issues can be done, but it takes time and attention to detail.

If you are looking for ways to improve your EWIS EMI performance, contact Lectromec.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. Michael is an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification and the chairman of the SAE AE-8A EWIS installation committee.