View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Management Standard & Regulation Conference & Report Maintenance & Sustainment Protection & Prevention Research Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 AS50881 FAR High Voltage FAR 25.1707 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage FAR 25.1709
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
25.1701 25.1703 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems Aircraft Power System Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) arc damage Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM F2799 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conduit Connector connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating diagnostic dielectric constant Distributed Power System DO-160 Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling ethernet EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech Green Taxiing Grounding Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation ICAs IEC60172 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Insulation insulation resistance IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab Kapton Laser Marking life limited parts life projection Lightning Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 Military 5088 modeling MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 No Fault Found off gassing Outgassing Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Rewiring Project Risk Assessment SAE Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure Shield Shielding signal cable silver plated wire smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice stored energy supportability Sustainment Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Shock Thermal Testing Tin plated conductors Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs verification Visual Inspection voltage white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification work unit code

Impact of Wires Used as Ladders

Testing & Assessment

Key Takeaways
  • Using wire harnesses as handhold is dis-advised.
  • Testing shows impact small weights can have on conductor performance.
  • Signal circuits are the most likely to be impacted when conductor resistance increases.

Maintaining an airplane can be as tricky as flying one. With millions of parts, fastidious attention to detail in maintenance is necessary to make sure that every individual piece is up to the high industry standard. Care for aircraft electrical systems can be exceptionally demanding; a B747, for example, has about 150 miles of wire, and even a small Cessna has between three to eight miles. This electrical wiring interconnect system (EWIS) network connects all of the aircraft systems.

Ideally, an aircraft’s EWIS aging is considered and monitored over time, but something as simple as gripping and pulling a wire or cable can change its electrical performance, specifically conductivity and resistance.

What is the issue?

When an aircraft is being assembled, much of the wiring system is in an exposed state. Further into the construction, wire harnesses are progressively combined and routed around structures, into clamps, and finally attached to aircraft components. Throughout the life of the plane, during some maintenance operations (particularly heavy maintenance, commercially known as D-checks), the wiring can also be exposed as it was during construction. It is during these times where the wiring is at the greatest risk of deformation through elongation; a technician may use the wiring harness to hang tools, or as something to grab onto to help get up into the plane.

These stresses on the wire can have a negative effect on the conductor. Like with all components, stresses below a threshold cause no damage. But by forcefully pulling on a wire harness, there is a chance that the stress will exceed the performance threshold and yield physical damage.

FAA Job Aid on Handholds
The FAA is pretty clear use of wire harnesses as footholds; just don’t do it. Source: FAA

The issues of wire damage due to mechanical stress have been known for quite some time. The “FAA Job Aid” on EWIS has several sections that especially address the issue:

  • Slide 37: “Position to eliminate/minimize use as handhold or support”
  • Slide 126: “Do not locate conduit where service or maintenance personnel might use as handhold or footstep”
  • Slide 161: Wiring installation drawings shall consider human factor elements such as using wiring as “foot/step holds”

FAA advisory circular 25.1701-1 also states that wiring should be protected from normal maintenance and crew operations:

“Wire bundles should be routed in accessible areas that are protected from damage from personnel, cargo, and maintenance activity. As far as practicable they should not be routed in areas where they are likely to be used as handholds or as support for personal equipment or where they could become damaged during removal of aircraft equipment (reference §§ 25.1719 and 25.1721).”

Empirical Evidence

To ultimately demonstrate the effect of using a wiring harness as a handhold or ladder, Lectromec setup a simple experiment. A single ten-foot section of 20AWG wire was secured at both ends with the center section spanning an open area.

Test Setup
The wire strain impact test setup.

For the experiment, the conductor resistance was initially measured free of weights. A five-pound (2.26 kg) weight was then gently added to the center of the wire and left for 60 seconds. The weight was removed, and the conductor resistance measured. This procedure was repeated with weights of 10, 15, and 20 lbs.

Applied Weight(lbs.)

Percentage of Resistance Change From Initial Value at 0lbs









Test results

The more weight applied to the conductor coincides with the increase in resistance. At maximum applied weight, there was a 6.40% increase in the measured wire resistance. The deformation of the conductor causes increased resistance and increased heat, which initiates a cycle that only continues to impact the performance of the conductor. In a system of 100V, this may not seem like much, but in a signal wire with 5V and sensitive electronic equipment, the change can be far greater and more detrimental to the system.


This testing evaluated the impact on a single wire, but what about the impact on a full wire harness? Bundling wires together will make the harness stiffer and better able to endure physical stresses. It is likely that a wire harness will need more physical stressing to yield the same effect measured with the single wire. But how many wire harnesses in an aircraft are identified as, “safe for a 200lbs technician to use as a ladder”?


Wire harnesses should be protected to prevent their use as equipment support and handholds. Keep in mind that the resistance was measured after just one minute of applied weight; think of what can happen when dozens of techs use the same wire harness as a ladder. While a 6.40% resistance change might not seem like much, wires carrying digital circuits are sensitive to voltage changes and are more likely to encounter lost signal packets and poor performing LRUs.

Devon Gonteski

Devon Gonteski

Engineer, Lectromec

Devon has been with Lectromec since 2017 and has been a key contributor on projects involving wire degradation assessment and wire/cable certification testing. Her skills in Lectromec’s lab ensure regular delivery of accurate test results across multiple disciplines.