View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Management Standard & Regulation Conference & Report Maintenance & Sustainment Protection & Prevention Research Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 AS50881 FAR High Voltage FAR 25.1707 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage FAR 25.1709
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
25.1701 25.1703 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems Aircraft Power System Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) arc damage Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM F2799 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conduit Connector connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating diagnostic dielectric constant Distributed Power System DO-160 Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling ethernet EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech Green Taxiing Grounding Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation ICAs IEC60172 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Insulation insulation resistance IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab Kapton Laser Marking life limited parts life projection Lightning Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 Military 5088 modeling MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 No Fault Found off gassing Outgassing Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Rewiring Project Risk Assessment SAE Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure Shield Shielding signal cable silver plated wire smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice stored energy supportability Sustainment Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Shock Thermal Testing Tin plated conductors Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs verification Visual Inspection voltage white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification work unit code

What Are You Missing from Your Risk Assessment?


Creating maintenance action plans for vehicle sustainment is a heavily detailed process involving the collaboration between multiple groups. If any group has a less detailed (or flawed) analysis, the potential impact could be felt for years/decades to come. A structured process for assessment is outlined in the mechanical subsystems integrity program (MECSIP) outlined in military standard MIL-STD-1798. Within this, the analysis of several subsystems is called out, including the wiring system.

One of the most complex areas of EWIS assessment is the fifth task: EWIS risk assessment . Here a large network of interconnected information that must be organized and analyzed. It is certainly possible with so many data elements needing evaluation, inspection, and consideration, that some areas will be unnoticed or outright ignored because of the analysis needs. If not handled correctly, some areas could be overlooked and have a significant impact on the overall reliability of the delivered analysis.

In this article, we consider critical areas that could be missing and how they could have a substantial influence on aircraft sustainment and maintenance.


One topic that is covered in numerous Lectromec articles is risk. Simply put, risk is a combination of failure severity and failure probability. If one of these is misunderstood, misclassified, or not fully evaluated, the risk determination will be flawed. For example, if an assessment looks at the probabilities of car breakdown and only focused on the engine, then it will be a surprise when there is a flat tire. So too is the case for the wiring system. By understanding the evolving probabilities of failure, it is possible to better maintain the vehicle.

Wire Aging
The likelihood of EWIS component failure is based on several factors, but they can be predicted. This predictive ability provides users with the best possible means for proactive action on their aircraft.

The critical separator here is how the EWIS failure probability is determined. If the EWIS evaluation is only a current condition assessment, then the subsequent EWIS risk profile is only defined for a single moment in time – the current state of the system. An example of this is shown in the accompanying figure. In the configuration shown here, we see that there is one wire harness that should be replaced, based on the parameters defined early in the assessment. Review of the other items has shown that they have some performance degradation but not to the point of needing replacement.

Looking at this configuration and current risk levels, a plan of action emerges. However, is this the best plan of action?

What Could be Missing?

What will be helpful at this point in the assessment would be to see how probability of failure or degradation will impact the risk over time. If EWIS component degradation predictions were available, then it would be possible to see how the risk will evolve over a 5, 10, or 15-year period.

EWIS risk projection
Risk can be determined and future risk can be predicted. This makes it possible to be proactive with your maintenance.

By evolving the probability of failure, Lectromec’s degradation models, environmental information about the zone, and the current condition of the aircraft, it becomes possible to predict forward for better planning than previously possible.

The figure here presents what can happen with predicting an additional 5 years for this aircraft. The degradation model suggests that, with five additional years of continued use, an additional wire harnesses (or zone) within this aircraft has reached a point of high risk.

Consider how this would impact the aircraft maintenance. If only the first risk assessment (sans EWIS degradation prediction) was available, then wire harness replacement would likely only be called for in one area of the aircraft. If that aircraft was again assessed five years later, then another round or harness replacement would be called for resulting in a new set of maintenance actions, more aircraft downtime, higher cost, and additional risk to the personnel on board during the four to five-year period of operation.

Now consider how the maintenance actions would be prepared if the information was originally presented as it is in figure 2. The maintenance planning could identify all areas of the aircraft needing replacement (or more focused maintenance). Further, it might then also be possible to concurrently perform the necessary actions to restore airworthiness.

Getting to the Solution

Getting an aging risk profile for an aircraft’s EWIS is not a trivial task; it is a task that takes a significant amount of planning coupled with the right tools. If done right, the data from this assessment should support EWIS decisions and budget allocations for several years.

Lectromec’s experience with the EWIS of aging aircraft makes it possible to get the most value from these efforts. Settling for a lower quality solution only can hurt fleet reliability. Use the right tools to protect your aircraft and its wiring system. Contact Lectromec.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. Michael is an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification and the chairman of the SAE AE-8A EWIS installation committee.