View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Management Standard & Regulation Conference & Report Maintenance & Sustainment Protection & Prevention Research Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 FAR AS50881 High Voltage FAR 25.1707 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage FAR 25.1709
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
25.1701 25.1703 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems Aircraft Power System Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) arc damage Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM F2799 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conduit Connector connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating diagnostic dielectric constant Distributed Power System DO-160 Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling ethernet EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech Green Taxiing Grounding Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation ICAs IEC60172 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Insulation insulation resistance IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab Kapton Laser Marking life limited parts life projection Lightning Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 Military 5088 modeling MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 No Fault Found off gassing Outgassing Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Rewiring Project Risk Assessment SAE Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure Shield Shielding signal cable silver plated wire smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires stored energy supportability Sustainment Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Shock Thermal Testing Tin plated conductors Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs verification Visual Inspection voltage white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification work unit code

Use of MIL-T-81490 cable in place of a MIL-DTL-17 cable

Testing & Assessment

Key Takeaways
  • High-frequency applications do not have the same requirements and should not use the same cables.
  • MIL-T-81490 cables are coaxial cables designed for high-frequency applications.
  • Lectromec can help with the testing and evaluation of MIL-T-81490 cables.
  • Listen to the podcast here.

The transmission of electrical energy is, surprisingly, not a trivial task. At low frequencies and low power, a very primitive wire construction is possible and can be successful for extended applications. As frequencies increase, the need for focused attention becomes ever more apparent.

A common ‘go-to’ cable for RF applications is the MIL-DTL-17 (sometimes MIL-C-17) cable. Many of the MIL-DTL-17 cables are rated to 1 GHz, some to 12.4 GHz (like M17/128), and only a couple at 20GHz (e.g. M17/130 and M17/133 – a word of caution with the /130 and /133 constructions: these are unjacketed cables with an exposed external conductor/shield). There is the M17/205 construction that is spec’d for up to 50GHz, but that comes with a caveat: attenuation. The accompanying figure shows the attenuation per 100ft of M17/205 cable; while the attenuation does rise quickly with higher frequencies, the specification does not provide any attenuation limits beyond 10 GHz.

Attenuation is the loss of signal strength over the cable length. This is the maximum allowable attenuation of MIL17/205 per 100 ft.

If someone is looking for that high-frequency performance, what options are there? One option is the MIL-T-81490 cable.

What are MIL-T-81490 Cables?

The MIL-T-81490 cables are specifically designed transmission line cables for aircraft systems (a transmission line in this case refers to cables designed for RF/microwave applications that must account for the properties of the propagated signal). Specifically, these cables are for applications that need to transmit with high fidelity high-frequency signals.

Construction of a MIL-T-81490 Cable

The MIL-T-81490 is a performance specification, not a detailed specification. For those that have not enjoyed years of standards, this means that elements of the cable’s construction are left to the manufacturer, but the cable must meet the minimum performance requirements outlined in the performance standard. What this means to the end user is that there can be significant performance variations between manufacturers.

First, there are three cable classes:

  • Class 1: Flexible – to be used for installations where bending is required to facilitate running long lengths, where attachment to shock mounted equipment is required, and where large angular displacements are encountered during service and maintenance.
  • Class 2: Semiflexible – to be used for installations where bending or forming is required to facilitate running long lengths, but where attachment to shock-mounted equipment is not required. This cable class is not intended for applications requiring continuous in-service flexing.
  • Class 3: Rigid – to be used in installations where bending is not needed. These cables are formed during manufacturing and cannot bend without potential damage.

The more rigid structures offer better attenuation performance. The attenuation performance between the three cable types is shown in the accompanying figure. Each of these construction classes have better attenuation performance in comparison to the afore mentioned MIL17/205 cable type.

MIL-T-81490 attenuation
Those seeking better performance from coaxial able applications should consider MIL-T-81490 style cables. Contact Lectromec to verify your cable performance.

From a construction perspective, the MIL-T-81490 cable will consist of the following construction (inside out):

  • Single core conductor usually plated with silver
  • Dielectric material, typically of some PTFE base
  • Shielding
  • Jacket

A straight comparison between a MIL-T-81490 cable and most MIL-C-17 cable constructions finds very little difference. The difference comes down to the performance requirements.

Where Would you use a MIL-T-81490 Style Cable?

As mentioned earlier, MIL-T-81490 cables are primarily for high-frequency applications. In addition to the flexibility classes, there are two types of MIL-T-81490 cable: Type I is for use in the range of 2.0 – 8.0 GHz, and Type II is designed to extend that range up to 16.0 GHz. Because of these high frequencies, they are often part of navigation and communications systems, as well as any high-data rate application.

Obviously, one of the requirements for a cable to be considered viable is a low signal attenuation.

Insertion Loss

With high frequency applications, insertion loss is often a key parameter. Simply put, insertion loss is a ratio of the signal on a cable or circuit. To get into the weeds, insertion loss is defined mathematically as

IL(dB) = 10 log10 Pt/Pr

Where Pt is the transmitted power and Pr is the received power. Ideally, the transmitted power equals the received power and the insertion loss is equal to zero. However, practical factors, such as reflected losses at connectors or splices, imperfect dielectric materials (the insulation behavior), and the resistance of the signal carrier (copper conductor) reduce the total power received at the end of the circuit.

To improve (reduce) the reflected losses at connectors, matched impedance connectors, affixed with the correct tools, are needed. For the dielectric materials, materials research is an ongoing effort to improve the electrical, mechanical, and thermal properties and there is a balance to improving one property without diminishing the performance in others. The final area to reduce insertion loss is on the conductor; perhaps the easiest means of doing this is limit the mechanical stresses (i.e. tight bends) and repeat flexing.

Testing and Evaluation

The test and evaluation of the MIL-T-81490 cable looks at a variety of electrical performance tests (voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR), impedance, velocity of propagation, and RF leakage. Beyond the electrical, chemical, mechanical, and thermal tests which are typically used. Those tests that must be considered for first article inspection include:


MIL-T-81490 cables are ideally suited for high-frequency applications seeking greater performance than available from MIL-C-17 cables. Because these cables are designed for aerospace applications, those cables meeting the performance requirements are aircraft ready.

For additional information about MIL-T-81490 cables and their use and application, WL Gore recently had a webinar on this topic. For those looking for testing, Lectromec’s ISO 17025 accredited lab is always ready to help.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. Michael is an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification and the chairman of the SAE AE-8A EWIS installation committee.