View Latest Blog Entries
Close
Categories
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Management Standard & Regulation Conference & Report Maintenance & Sustainment Research Protection & Prevention Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 FAR AS50881 FAR 25.1707 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Wire System High Voltage Arcing Damage FAR 25.1709 AS4373
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
25.1701 25.1703 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems Aircraft Power System Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) arc damage Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759/87 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM F2799 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice Cable cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor Connector connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating dielectric constant Distributed Power System DO-160 Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling ethernet EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech Green Taxiing Grounding Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation ICAs IEC60172 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Insulation insulation resistance IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab Laser Marking life limited parts life projection Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 Military 5088 modeling MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 No Fault Found off gassing Outgassing Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Performance Physical Testing Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet Power systems predictive maintenance Probability of Failure Product Quality Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) relays Reliability Research Rewiring Project Risk Assessment SAE Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure Shield Shielding signal cable silver plated wire smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires stored energy supportability Sustainment Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Shock Thermal Testing Tin plated conductors Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs verification Visual Inspection white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire failure wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification work unit code

How to prevent overheating of wire harnesses in space

Protection & Prevention

Preventing Overheating of Wires in Aerospace

In the aircraft industry, a lot of effort goes into thermal management of the electrical wire interconnection system (EWIS). If not effectively managed, systems fail to operate and may lead to failures. A recent example of this is the case with the Boeing 787 battery issues (read the Report on Boeing 787 Dreamliner Battery Flaws Finds Lapses at Multiple Points). The thermal management of the wiring system is just as important as the thermal management of any other aircraft component. But what about thermal management of EWIS on spacecraft?

In the earth’s atmosphere, heat is dissipated in three ways: through convection, conduction, and radiation. Some of these methods can be estimated directly, but the complexity of convection can require more advanced tools for analysis. SAE standard AS50881, Wiring Aerospace Vehicle, gives the accepted aerospace standard for up to an altitude of 100k feet. Theoretical models for in space conditions can more easily give insight into what can be expected from a wire under electrical load than those for in atmospheric conditions.

Two modes of heat transfer need a medium: convection and conduction. Space in general, lacks such medium. For a wire in a space-based application, the only heat transfer mechanisms that can occur are radiative heat loss and conduction along the wire. If we ignore the thermal conduction down the wire to other system components, black body radiation of the wire at elevated temperature can give a good understanding of the wire’s ampacity.

A Wire in Space

Black body radiation of an object is the amount of light energy that is emitted over the whole light spectrum per time for a given temperature. The energy per unit time and surface area, radiated from a system is given by:

E= σT4

where σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant and T is the object’s temperature. Multiplying this energy by the surface area per length (circumference) of a wire gives the energy per time (power) being radiated for a given length of wire. From this, we have power dissipated per length of wire.

A wire will cause joule heating (also known as resistive heating) when there is an electrical current on the wire. The electrical energy converted to heat is given by,

P = I2R

where I is the current and R is the resistance of the wire per length. For any closed system at constant entropy (equilibrium), the energy in equals the energy out. So, for a given current on a wire, the wire will heat up due to joule heating until it matches the radiative heat loss. Reference Fig. 1, the curve labeled “space,” for the current and temperature at equilibrium for a 20 gauge wire.

A Wire at Ambient Atmospheric Conditions Varying Altitude

For aerospace applications within the earth’s atmosphere, we reference AS50881. For, a single copper wire, the rationale of AS50881 can be represented by the following formula:

I = HIg(x)

Where I is the maximum allowed current for the wire at the prescribed altitude, Ig is the current of the same gauge wire at standard temperature and pressure, which is a function of the wire’s maximum temperature rating and the ambient temperature of the operational environment. A graph of Ig(x) for various wire gauges and ‘H’ at various altitudes are provided in AS50881 Rev D.

overheating of wire harnesses
Figure 1: Maximum allowable current for varying temperature ratings for a 20 AWG wire at varying altitudes assuming 20oC

U.S. Standard Atmosphere, 1976 (NASA-TM-X-74335) provides standard ambient temperatures for different altitudes. These ambient temperatures can be used for the operational environment. Reference Table 1 for ambient temperatures at chosen altitudes. Using these ambient temperatures and AS50881, we can generate curves for the maximum allowable current for a given rated temperature of wire. The results of this analysis are in Fig. 1 for four different altitudes for a single 20 AWG wire.

Note: The data above assumes ambient temperatures as the wire’s operational temperatures at altitude. If the wires are in a pressurized, temperature-controlled cabin, these curves must be recalculated based on those operational conditions.

Another challenge that exists is the routing of the wire harness in an enclosed space. If the area is sealed or relatively small, the wire may heat up the local area. When considering the impact of the allowable current, the higher temperature environment causes the curves to shift right.

Altitude (feet X 1000) Ambient Temp. (kelvin)
0 288.2
30 228.7
60 216.7
100 227.1

Table 1: Ambient Temperatures used

Impact of Local Environment

As could be expected, removing the convection heat loss mode results in different maximum temperature profiles between atmospheric and space conditions. The AS50881 standards up to 100k feet rely on a correction factor to ground conditions. If the atmosphere were diffuse enough (at high enough altitude), the curve generated from the space model should take over. This effect might not appear in the rationale of AS50881, because it may be very small up to 100k feet or, if it is large enough to be visible in the phenomena, the altitude correctional factor might be designed to be conservative to allow room between engineering design and the failure mechanism of an overheating wire.

The model in space seems to be a good conservative estimate model for the maximum current allowable. An exception is the 100k feet case, where the curve goes below that of the wire in a vacuum model. In this range, the ozone layer is active and the temperature is higher than expected when compared to a case in which we assume thermodynamic equilibrium between atmospheric altitudes (move air from the ground up to 100k feet adiabatically and you will have a much lower temperature than in ambient conditions at 100k feet).

Conclusion

The operational environment affects the methods for heat loss and cooling of electrical system components. In space, due to a lack of medium required for conduction or convection, radiative heat loss and conduction are the only mechanisms of heat loss along a wire. Ignoring conduction, black body radiation of the wire at elevated temperature can give a good understanding of the wire’s ampacity. In Earth’s atmosphere, under ambient conditions, the wire in a vacuum model can often be used as a conservative ballpark estimate. Operational temperatures can vary greatly from ambient temperatures in applications. If the operational temperature is high, one must choose an appropriately high temperature rating of wire and design an appropriately low current on this wire.

Tristan Epp Schmidt

Tristan Epp Schmidt

Engineer, Lectromec

Since starting at Lectromec in early 2015, Tristan has been key in many of test and assessment wire systems assessment projects wire systems assessment. His attention to detail has lead to several key insights in Lectromec’s research initiatives.