View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Management Standard & Regulation Conference & Report Maintenance & Sustainment Protection & Prevention Research Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 AS50881 FAR High Voltage FAR 25.1707 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage FAR 25.1709
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
25.1701 25.1703 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems Aircraft Power System Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) arc damage Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM F2799 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conduit Connector connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating diagnostic dielectric constant Distributed Power System DO-160 Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling ethernet EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech Green Taxiing Grounding Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation ICAs IEC60172 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Insulation insulation resistance IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab Kapton Laser Marking life limited parts life projection Lightning Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 Military 5088 modeling MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 No Fault Found off gassing Outgassing Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Rewiring Project Risk Assessment SAE Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure Shield Shielding signal cable silver plated wire smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice stored energy supportability Sustainment Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Shock Thermal Testing Tin plated conductors Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs verification Visual Inspection voltage white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification work unit code

Dealing with EMI and EMV on radio frequency (RF) cables for aerospace applications


Because of this high level of compliance, the task group recommended that the UASs use the AS50881. For those looking to produce UASs, the current guidance outlined in AS50881 is the place to start when developing system design documents.

The aerospace industry has been dealing with Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) and Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) since the early 1900s. EMI can cause interruptions ranging from poor signal quality to an overall system malfunction, which can result in devastating outcomes for any type of plane.

EMI is generated by natural phenomena like lightning and static electricity (called natural EMI sources), as well as by cell phones, airport towers, airborne transmitters (from a nearby aircraft in flight, for example) and ground-based satellites. The main rationale behind flight crew instructions to passengers on commercial flights to turn off their cell phones and other electronic equipment prior to aircraft takeoff and landing is related to concerns that EMI could cause unpredictable aircraft behavior and interference with the navigation system. For example, the cause of the 1964 crash of TWA Flight 800 (a Boeing 707) remains unclear, but may have been related to EMI. In 2011, ABC News reported on an industry study that documented about 75 separate incidents of possible electronic interference that airline pilots and other crew members believed were linked to mobile phones and other electronic devices. Even a heart monitor has the capability to cause interference with the aircraft’s electronic systems.

The aircraft systems that are most vulnerable, also known as EMV systems, are navigation and communication systems, autopilot, the fuel sensor, yaw dampers, and auto-throttle. It is very important to use precautions and follow the standards in place to minimize any sort of interference from outside circuits or systems. It is impossible to eliminate all sources of EMI on aircraft, because there are so many types of EMI, including cosmic noise. There are, however, some important methods to eliminate most interference and decrease the chances of EMI.

EMI Reduction – Installation

One of the key factors is the type of wires used on the aircraft and how they are installed. The AS50881 wiring systems installation manual recommends the MIL-C-85485 cable, which is an RF cable for systems that require radio frequency functionalities. They have different shielding and more layers than normal cables, as shown in the figures below:

RF Cable Single Conductor Wire

The shielding in this type of cable is braided to reduce the electromagnetic energy in a particular area to ground. This braided shielding is especially effective at minimizing low frequencies, and it provides maximum EMI protection while maintaining good flexibility. This layer configuration for RF cables can eliminate up to 95% of EMI with appropriate installation by following the AIR4465 Filter Line Handbook. The handbook is very useful for learning about the necessary spacing between the main RF cable and other circuits and systems to decrease EMI.

Wire Degradation
EMI Shielding for Cables

[Left] RF cable with its layers used on aircraft. [Right] Single conductor wire

Ways to reduce EMI/EMV

  • Use the right type of wire (RF Cable)
  • Utilize appropriate spacing between the cables and circuits
  • Insulate the device/circuit properly
  • Eliminate the use of cell phones/electronic devices during takeoff and landing
  • Eliminate shared paths for common-impedance noise
  • Employ appropriate shielding by enclosing cables in a wire-mesh cable jacket
  • Secure the back shell to the connector for a better completed ground circuit


The main topic discussed in this article is the effect of EMI/EMV on aircraft; it also examines the various sources of EMI, including man-made electronics devices and natural phenomena. It is important to understand that an electronic device can affect the functionality and destroy or wipe out the signals of an aircraft. Installing the right type of wires and protecting them as recommended in AS50881 is critical to protecting the aircraft from any sort of EMI/EMV.

Omid Orfany

Omid Orfany

Electrical Engineer, Lectromec

Omid is an EE with a background in electrical system design and analysis. Since he started with Lectromec, Omid has worked on a variety of projects including wire failure assessment, equipment design, and EWIS degradation.