View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Management Standard & Regulation Conference & Report Maintenance & Sustainment Protection & Prevention Research Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 AS50881 FAR High Voltage FAR 25.1707 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage FAR 25.1709
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
25.1701 25.1703 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems Aircraft Power System Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) arc damage Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM F2799 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conduit Connector connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating diagnostic dielectric constant Distributed Power System DO-160 Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling ethernet EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech Green Taxiing Grounding Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation ICAs IEC60172 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Insulation insulation resistance IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab Kapton Laser Marking life limited parts life projection Lightning Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 Military 5088 modeling MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 No Fault Found off gassing Outgassing Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Rewiring Project Risk Assessment SAE Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure Shield Shielding signal cable silver plated wire smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice stored energy supportability Sustainment Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Shock Thermal Testing Tin plated conductors Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs verification Visual Inspection voltage white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification work unit code

Connector Failure Rates – Part #1


Coming up with failure rates of electrical components is always a difficult task. Historically, when failure modes and effects analyses were created for aircraft systems, the level of detail of EWIS component failures were severely lacking. Some organizations would create a single failure number for an entire circuit, regardless of the wires or connections made in that circuit.

Using modern tools and design technologies makes it possible to have a more thorough evaluation and accurate representation of the EWIS failure rates within fault trees. This still presents an issue with gathering the necessary information to determine what is the best failure rate to use. One often cited standard is the military handbook MIL-HDBK-217. Although this document has not been updated in years, it still is a useful data source. Here we review the failure rate presented for circular connectors and what this suggests when used on aircraft.


The purpose of the MIL-HDBK-217 is to “establish and maintain consistent and uniform methods for estimating the inherent reliability of military electronic equipment and systems”. Further, the handbook provides a common basis for predicting future maintenance needs. Those who have maintained any platform will acknowledge that proactive maintenance is the best way to keep cost down. The handbook seeks to provide the data to make that predictive maintenance possible.

Just like any other component, connector reliability cannot be assumed. Getting the right number into fault trees is necessary to get the best failure projection.

As identified in the introduction, the handbook has not been updated in more than two decades; the latest revision of this handbook is from 1995. Tools and technologies have significantly improved in many areas since that time and at the very least, the reliability has remained consistent if not improved. While the failure rates presented in the handbook may be a little out of date, this does provide a conservative basis for the estimation of part reliability.

Of course, failure rates do not exist in a vacuum. As additional data becomes available and service history information is thoroughly reviewed, organizations can improve or modify these models to best reflect what they see and practice. The handbook provides the general case and the general direction; it is the responsibility of the user to make it specific to the organization and application.


MIL-HDBK-217 Section 15 addresses connectors. At its core, the handbook provides a formula and a set of parameters that can be used to estimate the reliability.

The first item to note here is that the failure rates presented are for mated connectors. The MIL-HDBK-217 suggests that, if a connector is attached to a Line Replaceable Unit (LRU), then the failure rate should be divided in half with the failure rate being assigned to both the LRU connector and the EWIS connector. The reason for this is to provide better reliability numbers on the LRU. EWIS engineers should be grateful to hear that they are not responsible for the full failure rate of the connector.

Failure Rate Factors

The connector failure rate presented in MIL-HDBK- 217 is comprised of four factors: the base failure rate, the active number of pins, the environmental factor, and the mating/unmating factor.

Base Failure Rate

The base failure rate factor uses the connector insert material to separate connectors into four possible groups. These groups are:

Insert Material Type

Common Insert Materials

Temperature Range (C)


Vitreous Glass, Alumina, Ceramic, Polyimide

-55 to 250


Diallylphtalate, Melamine, Fluorosilicione, Silicone, Rubber, Polysulfone

-55 to 200


Polyteyrafluorethylene (Teflon)

-55 to 125


Polyamide (Nylon), Polychloroprene (Neoprene), Polyethylene

-55 to 125

Since each of these insert materials have different temperature ranges for operation and different performance histories, there are different base failure rate formulas for each of them. Unfortunately, this creates a more difficult approximation for each configuration. The main difference between the formula is the maximum temperature rating and a couple of scalar factors.

Where this becomes more complicated is the connector temperature rise estimation. While the temperature rise within the connector can be quickly determined through laboratory testing, a generalized formulation for connector rise is difficult. Different insert materials, contact arrangements, airflow within a compartment, etc., can dramatically change the connector internal temperature. MIL-HDBK-217 guidance on estimating the temperature increase is a formula considering the combination of contact gauge and amps per contact.

Next Article

Without service data, estimations of component failure rates must use previously established best performance estimates. MIL-HDBK-217 provides a good starting basis for basic component failure rates for use in fault trees. In Lectromec’s next article, we will review some of the consequences of using this failure model and what it predicts for EWIS reliability.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. Michael is an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification and the chairman of the SAE AE-8A EWIS installation committee.