View Latest Blog Entries
Close
Categories
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Standard & Regulation Management Conference & Report Maintenance & Sustainment Protection & Prevention Research Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 AS50881 FAR High Voltage FAR 25.1707 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage AS4373
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
25.1701 25.1703 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems Aircraft Power System Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) arc damage Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM F2799 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conductors conduit Connector connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating diagnostic dielectric constant Distributed Power System DO-160 dynamic cut through Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling ethernet EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech Green Taxiing Grounding Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation ICAs IEC60172 IEEE Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Insulation insulation resistance IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab Kapton Laser Marking life limited parts life projection Lightning Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel measurement Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 Military 5088 modeling MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 No Fault Found off gassing Outgassing Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Rewiring Project Risk Assessment SAE Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure Shield Shielding signal cable silver plated wire smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards stored energy supportability Sustainment Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Shock Thermal Testing Tin plated conductors Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs USAF verification Visual Inspection voltage white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code

Can the EWIS be Safe After a Modification?

Certification Maintenance & Sustainment

The days of ‘fit and forget’ EWIS are at least a decade behind, the aircraft industry’s understanding of the implications of wiring as a system continues to evolve. New aircraft have gone through EWIS evaluations to ensure that the EWIS complies to regulations – not an easy task. Obviously, as the OEM design choices remain in the field, the original knowledge that developed the routing, installation, and protection disappears, but what about aftermarket modification of the aircraft EWIS? Is it possible to take a new aircraft (or one that has been in service for 15 years) that has been originally certified to EWIS regulations and mark it compliant (i.e. keep a safe EWIS)?

Regulatory Guidance

Consider a new aircraft design: there is a lot of information that is necessary for the development of a safe EWIS (see this article on the areas that must covered as part of EWIS certification). However, when performing aftermarket modifications, is it possible to gather this information and not impact airworthiness?

As a starting point for those not familiar with EWIS requirements on new aircraft the following articles can be helpful to get started:

  • EWIS Regulatory Compliance with 25.1707
  • EWIS Risk Assessment with 25.1709

As a basis for answering this, we can go to the FAA guidance on the topic. Advisor Circular (AC) 25-1701

For those that are not intimately familiar with AC 25.1701, there is guidance on how to handle certification compliance with the regulations for both new aircraft designs and aircraft modifications. In terms of the EWIS assessment portion (25.1709) the modification of EWIS requires different handling. The guidance that is specifically laid out in the AC states:

Post-TC EWIS Workflow
Flowchart #2 from FAA AC 25.1701-1 shows a possible process for EWIS certification when handling post TC modifications.

“Applicants for post-Type Certification modifications should use the analysis depicted in Flowchart 2 when the applicant cannot identify the systems or systems functions contained in existing aircraft EWIS that may be utilized as part of the modification. An applicant should not add EWIS to an existing EWIS if the systems or systems functions contained in the existing EWIS are unknown. To do so could introduce unacceptable hazards. For example, IFE power wires could inadvertently be routed with aircraft autoland EWIS.”

What does that mean for a modifier who needs to run wires in the aircraft? Either figure out everything in the wire harness (e.g. contained systems, failure tolerances, designed separation distances) into which the wires are to be added, or run the wire harness separately.

Trying to run the wiring separately can be a challenge when routing through lighting holes in structures where space is limited. Making the determination as to which course of action to take becomes a balance between the creation of additional feedthrough holes (which may weaken the structure) or joining the harnesses for the feedthrough then breakout afterwards. Depending on the systems involved and the potential risk of the additional wire, this may be acceptable for short lengths. Only configuration review and analysis can determine if this is acceptable.

A recent article from Lectromec covered some of the advancing technologies for EWIS design which include distributed power. These distributed power systems do provide ease for upgrades and modification to aircraft systems, but they do pose a whole new complexity for certification. In effect, using the distributed networks violate the AC’s guidance in that the new wiring is routed with existing systems. How this will be handled is not trivial and will require in-depth consideration and analysis.

Verify Changes, Verify Reliability

The modification of the EWIS should include a review from the maintenance perspective. Each aircraft should have an Enhanced Zonal Assessment Program (EZAP) as specified in AC 25-27A. The EZAP is designed such that there is a systematic approach to the aircraft wiring system review (something that the FAA felt was lacking in many maintenance programs). A full article on this has already been written and is available here. The basics of the EZAP are this:

  • Define the zone boundaries
  • List what is in the zone
  • Determine the risk of fire, mechanical damage, or environmental factors that can impact EWIS reliability
  • Determine the EWIS complexity in the zone
  • Use the combination of factors in the last two to set regular inspection intervals
  • As changes are made to the EWIS, the EZAP should be updated to account for new risk introduced to the system.

Achieve a Safe EWIS

A safe EWIS can be achieved, but it is not an easy task for a modifier. Some of the up and coming electrical system designs will make it easier for installation but may place additional challenges on the maintainer for certification. However, these changes and implemented, they must be created in such a way that they are able to be inspected and maintainable. If you have any questions about how to support your components, design, certification or sustainment of your fleet, contact Lectromec.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. Michael has an FAA DER appointment with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification.