View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Management Standard & Regulation Conference & Report Maintenance & Sustainment Protection & Prevention Research Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 AS50881 FAR High Voltage FAR 25.1707 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage FAR 25.1709
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
25.1701 25.1703 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems Aircraft Power System Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) arc damage Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM F2799 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conduit Connector connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating diagnostic dielectric constant Distributed Power System DO-160 Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling ethernet EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech Green Taxiing Grounding Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation ICAs IEC60172 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Insulation insulation resistance IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab Kapton Laser Marking life limited parts life projection Lightning Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 Military 5088 modeling MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 No Fault Found off gassing Outgassing Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Rewiring Project Risk Assessment SAE Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure Shield Shielding signal cable silver plated wire smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice stored energy supportability Sustainment Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Shock Thermal Testing Tin plated conductors Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs verification Visual Inspection voltage white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification work unit code

The process for identifying an EWIS problem on an aircraft often follows these steps:

  • At some point during aircraft operation a system malfunctions and the pilot reports the malfunction.
  • Maintenance starts by replacing the system component. Depending on schedule and criticality, the maintenance action is scheduled. Often, the first action to be taken is the replacement of the Line-Replaceable Unit (LRU).
  • With the LRU replaced, a system check is done and the aircraft is released.
  • The LRU is sent for inspection/repair.
  • The LRU is inspected and marked as “No Fault Found” (NFF).
  • The “defective” device is returned to inventory.
  • The EWIS is examined and the original problem is detected.

There is a reason for this type of maintenance: it is easier to replace a LRU than to track down an intermittent EWIS problem. From a financial perspective, this cycle requires a large inventory of LRUs to support this type of maintenance action.

EWIS failure trends

Lectromec recently performed a review of the FAA’s SDR database to determine how close the actual EWIS failure numbers were to those that were reported. One of the problems often found when searching for reported EWIS failures is that the failures are often hidden within the failure reporting of other systems. This example was reported as a flap control system problem:


Although this was an EWIS problem, it was not marked in the proper category. For those that are looking to glean information from their maintenance database, it is likely that this key information is being missed. Those looking for a process for pulling data from a maintenance database, Task #2 in the USAF’s EWIS SLEP handbook, MIL-HDBK-525, provides an effective and efficient way of tackling this. The same process can be applied to commercial maintenance systems. Ideally, the maintainers are trained to place each component into the right code. However, if you review the scenario described above, there can be flexibility in this process.

The review of the 2014 SDR data, found that maintainers are doing an excellent job in filing EWIS problems. A manual review of over 800 records found that roughly 8% of EWIS problems are attributed to the wrong system (e.g. flight control system versus flight control system wiring). The most common reason for this misattribution appears to be that the system was identified to have suffered a functional problem when the actual source of the problem was a physical one that was related to wiring issues.

Overall EWIS reliability

A review of the last four years of EWIS failure data reported through FAA’s SDR database shows some promising trends. Five component types were examined during this research: wires, wire harnesses, splices, cables, and connectors. Four out of the five of the categories (wires, wire harnesses, cables, and connectors) examined from the SDR database showed a decline in failure count. Note that these are raw results and have not been individually examined.

The most dramatic decline over the four-year period has been with cables. From 2011, which saw 211 ‘cable’ service difficulties to only 144 in 2014, it is a 46% drop. Taking all five of the categories together, 2014 has seen a 30% decline in reported EWIS problems. This is truly encouraging from an aircraft reliability standpoint.

EWIS failure trends

As a check to see if this decline in the number of EWIS failure incidents was due to a general decline in total system incidents reported to the SDR or a trend particularly associated with wires, several weeks were examined in 2011 and 2014. The evaluation found that, on average, there were 15% more incidents reported through the FAA SDR system from 2011 to 2014. This makes it even more impressive given that the number of reported wire incidents have declined.


Potential reasons for this overall decline:

  • The implementation of the FAA’s EZAP (Enhanced Zonal Awareness Procedure) caused a spike of EWIS related reports, where inspections found latent EWIS failures. The latest results for 2014 may be what should be expected annually.
  • It has been seven years since the FAA released the new EWIS regulations and seventeen years since the last major incident attributed to EWIS. Perhaps maintainers are becoming complacent with examining/reporting EWIS problems.

If the results are to be believed, the industry is going the right way in design, manufacturing, and maintaining its EWIS.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. In September 2014, Michael was appointed as an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification.