Testing & Assessment

Contact Retention, Contact Walkout, and the Risk of Backed-Out Pins

Introduction

Electrical connectors are amazing: exposed ends of conductors carrying tiny signals or hundreds of amps are inserted into holes, insulated from one another, held in place by clips, and used to continue circuits through the precise alignment of exposed metal contacts. Even after testing for electrical performance, corrosion resistance, and environmental sealing, a connector can still fail because one contact among dozens does not remain in its intended position. This failure to maintain a contact in the proper position is often called “contact back-out” or “contact walkout.” Depending on the amount of movement, the result may be reduced electrical engagement, intermittent continuity, or complete circuit failure.

For aircraft Electrical Wiring Interconnection Systems (EWIS), contact retention is particularly important. Aircraft connectors experience vibration, temperature cycling, mechanical handling, and forces transmitted through wire bundles. The retention mechanism must withstand these conditions throughout the connector's service life.

How Connector Contact Retention Works

Many aerospace connectors use removable crimp contacts secured within an insulating insert. In a typical rear-release design, the contact contains a circumferential retention groove. When the contact is inserted into its cavity, spring-loaded retention tines engage this groove, preventing the contact from moving beyond its intended position.

The retention system must perform two functions simultaneously:

  1. Maintain the correct axial position of the contact during operation.
  2. Permit intentional removal using an approved extraction tool without damaging the connector.

With rare exceptions, this combination of secure retention and serviceability is essential for aerospace maintenance. The alternative is typically to make the connector and attached harness into a line-replaceable unit with limited flight-line repair capability. This approach to removal depends on more than the contact itself. The insert cavity and retention clip are connector factors, the contact geometry is a contact factor, and the installation procedure is a production factor. All four must function together.

Because these factors are interrelated, a properly manufactured contact installed in a damaged cavity may not remain secure. Similarly, an undamaged connector may experience contact displacement if the contact was never fully seated during assembly. Regardless of how contact-to-contact mating fails, the result can be a mechanical defect that develops into an electrical failure.

What Happens When a Contact Backs Out?

A “backed-out” contact has moved away from its designed position within a connector, typically toward the wire-entry side. Consider a pin contact that has not fully engaged its retention mechanism. During connector mating, the opposing socket applies an axial force to the pin. Instead of remaining stationary, the pin may move backward into the insert.

The connector shells can still become fully coupled, giving the appearance of a successful connection. However, the affected contact may have insufficient engagement with its mating socket, leading to one or more of the following:

A backed-out socket can be difficult to identify through visual inspection of the connector face. The critical issue is that proper connector coupling does not guarantee proper individual contact engagement.

Why Contact Walkout Matters for Aircraft EWIS

Aircraft wiring systems rarely operate under static mechanical conditions. Like the rest of the aircraft, wire bundles experience vibration and normal operational shocks, such as hard landings. Maintenance activities can introduce additional handling loads, while temperature changes cause materials to expand and contract. Each of these conditions can transfer mechanical forces to individual contacts.

Even when the connector shell is firmly mounted, the wires entering the connector may move relative to the connector body; properly sized strain relief mitigates this motion. If strain relief is not used or is poorly sized, movement can repeatedly load the retention system. A retention mechanism that withstands a single mechanical force may behave differently when subjected to repeated loading from changing directions. This is the distinction between static contact retention and dynamic contact walkout. Both are important because connector reliability depends not only on the maximum force a contact can withstand, but also on its ability to remain seated under repeated mechanical stress.

Contact Retention Testing: Resistance to Axial Displacement

Contact retention testing assesses whether an installed contact remains properly positioned when subjected to a specified axial force. A commonly used test method is described in EIA/ECA-364-29, Contact Retention Test Procedure for Electrical Connectors. For MIL-DTL-38999-qualified connectors, Section 4.5.20 establishes additional requirements, including specified test loads and application directions.

For this test, the contact is subjected to a controlled force along its longitudinal axis, tending to displace it toward either the front or rear of the connector.

Representative loads from MIL-DTL-38999N, Amendment 1, include:

Contact SizeApplied Axial Load
22D10 lbf (44 N)
2015 lbf (67 N)
1625 lbf (111 N)
1225 lbf (111 N)

These values apply to the identified connector specification and should not be assumed universal for other connector families. Under MIL-DTL-38999, the contact's axial displacement must not exceed 0.012 inches (0.30 mm), and the test must not damage the contact or insert. Although this places strain on the contact-to-wire crimp, the test evaluates the retention system's mechanical integrity rather than the tensile strength of the crimp.

Contact Walkout Testing: Repeated Mechanical Loading

In addition to contact retention testing, there is also a contact walkout test. Contact walkout testing examines whether repeated mechanical loading can cause an installed contact to become dislodged.

In the test, two contacts in each plug and receptacle are crimped to appropriately sized stranded steel cables and installed in the connector. The unmated connector is mounted in a rotating test fixture, and a 3-pound load is applied to the cable. The fixture undergoes 100 complete 360-degree rotations, with each rotation representing one test cycle. The specified cycling rate is 10 to 20 cycles per minute.

The contact walkout test applies a 3 lbf (13.3 N) load while the unmated connector fixture completes 100 full rotations.

This test method repeatedly stresses the installed contact and its retention mechanism in a configuration that attempts to represent manufacturing, installation, and maintenance stresses. The acceptance requirement is straightforward: the contacts must not become dislodged from their normal positions. Unlike a simple axial loading test, this procedure challenges the retention system through repeated changes in mechanical-loading orientation.

The test is particularly useful for identifying weaknesses that may not be evident during a single static-force application. The results should also be considered in the context of the particular installation. Depending on the application, a connector may not need to withstand as high a load or as many cycles.

Common Causes of Contact Retention Failures

Contact back-out and walkout can originate from manufacturing defects, assembly errors, or service-related degradation. Incomplete contact insertion is among the most direct causes. If the retention tines do not fully engage the contact groove, the contact may appear installed without being mechanically locked. Damaged retention clips can also reduce holding capability. Damage may result from incorrect insertion or extraction tools, excessive force, or repeated maintenance that deforms the retention mechanism.

When the installation is considered, wire-bundle loading can introduce sustained or repeated forces. Poor routing, insufficient slack, and inadequate backshell strain relief may transmit these loads directly to the contacts. Guidance from AS50881 on clamp placement is particularly helpful in addressing this concern.

Finally, environmental exposure, material degradation, and repeated thermal or vibration stresses can affect retention performance over time.

These factors demonstrate why connector reliability must be considered at both the component and installation levels.

Detection and Prevention

Preventing contact back-out begins with proper assembly and continues through inspection and maintenance. Contacts should be installed using the correct tools and approved procedures. Installation confirmation, including any specified light pullback verification, helps establish that the retention mechanism has engaged. During inspection, technicians should look for uneven contact positioning, damaged cavities, improperly seated contacts, and evidence of excessive wire loading.

One common element that supports all of these activities is training. A well-trained staff with proper quality controls will help limit the frequency of these events.

To supplement a properly trained staff, electrical continuity testing may help identify an existing fault, but a stationary continuity measurement cannot reliably demonstrate that a contact will remain seated under mechanical stress.

From a connector-qualification perspective, mechanical retention and walkout tests provide more direct evidence of retention-system performance. When contact displacement is suspected, the connector should be evaluated using the applicable maintenance instructions rather than attempting to reseat the contact through uncontrolled force.

Conclusion

Contact retention is a relatively small mechanical detail with significant implications for EWIS reliability. A single backed-out pin or socket can compromise an otherwise functional connector, creating intermittent electrical faults that may be difficult to reproduce during troubleshooting.

Contact retention and contact walkout testing address different aspects of this risk. One evaluates resistance to controlled axial loading; the other evaluates the ability to remain seated during repeated mechanical loading. Together with appropriate installation practices, environmental qualification, and inspection, these tests help demonstrate that connector contacts will remain where they belong throughout service.

Michael Traskos
Michael Traskos
President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in the field of EWIS for more than two decades and has worked on a wide range of projects from basic component testing, aircraft certification, and remaining service life assessments. Michael is an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification, the former chairman of the SAE AE-8A EWIS installation committee, and current vice chairman of the SAE AE-8D Wire and Cable standards committee.