View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Standard & Regulation Management Conference & Report Maintenance & Sustainment Protection & Prevention Research Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 AS50881 FAR High Voltage FAR 25.1707 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) AS4373 Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
25.1701 25.1703 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems Aircraft Power System Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) arc damage Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM F2799 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conductors conduit Connector connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating diagnostic dielectric constant Distributed Power System DO-160 dynamic cut through Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling ethernet EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech Green Taxiing Grounding Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation ICAs IEC60172 IEEE Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Insulation insulation resistance IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab Kapton Laser Marking life limited parts life projection Lightning Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel measurement Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 Military 5088 modeling MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 No Fault Found off gassing Outgassing Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Rewiring Project Risk Assessment SAE Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure Shield Shielding signal cable silver plated wire smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards stored energy supportability Sustainment Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Shock Thermal Testing Tin plated conductors Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs USAF verification Visual Inspection voltage white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code

Latest news on aircraft wire from the SAE’s Fall 2015 wire and cable committee meeting

Conference & Report

aircraft wire
The latest SAE AE-8A and 8D meeting was held in Indianapolis, Indiana. Lectromec was there to keep up to date on the latest and greatest developments in aircraft wire.

Indianapolis, Indiana was the perfect venue for last week’s SAE semi-annual wire and cable committee meeting (SAE AE-8A and 8D). After witnessing these committees’ meetings year after year, you can really appreciate the incremental improvements that have been made over time. Below are some of the updates from this meeting:

Temperature Rating of Mated Parts

One issue that came up during the meeting was how to choose the temperature rating on terminals. Certified insulated terminals are below the rating of the wire with the maximum temperature at 150°C. However, some wires have ratings as high as 260°C – which is far in excess of the ratings for insulated terminals. Within the AS50881, there is some ambiguity as to how supporting devices (terminals, clamps, etc.) for wiring should be selected. For example, if the wire rating is 260°C and the operational environment is 100°C, what is the minimum necessary temperature rating for a wire terminal? The lack of a standard creates an incongruity with the wire ratings and creates some difficulty ensuring consistent design and usage. This means, one engineer might look at the operational environment and think that the temperature rating should be 100°C, while another engineer may look at the the same installed wire harness and say that the terminal should be as close as possible to the wire rating (260°C).

Aircraft Wire Manufacturer Laser Marking

Another topic that came up at the SAE meeting was the use of Ultraviolet (UV) laser marking by wire manufacturers. Typically, the wire manufacturer’s ID code is placed on the wires using an ink process. These processes for applying the code are not the most reliable and can create smeared/unusable markings (these runs may need to be scraped).

In practice and in application, the wire identification is often not critical for use once the actual circuit identification or wire identification is placed on the wire by an aircraft Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) or harness manufacturer. However, it is preferable to improve the readability of the manufacture’s code while not affecting the aircraft’s OEM code. Two groups presented their findings of applying this type of laser marking and distinguishing it from an aircraft manufacturer’s wire identification. The results were promising. It appears the technology is ready to move forward for new and improved wire identification and reduce potential scrapping of wire production runs.


Another issue brought up during the meeting was the impact on the aircraft industry by the Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) and the REACH initiatives. As discussed in previous reports, the reduction of materials identified as toxic is becoming more and more difficult for aerospace applications. One of the more recent difficulties that was discussed is how the percentages or RoHS materials are calculated. For example, to achieve the color red, a wire insulation will typically include chromium. Chromium, in terms of its weight in the wire composition, will likely be of less than 1% of the overall weight of the wire. Once the red wire is installed into an aircraft, it contributes to less than 1% of the overall aircraft weight. But the way the calculation and reporting of how much chromium is in the vehicle is a much more complicated issue.

Further, right now many countries, particularly in Europe, are inconsistently applying the reduction of hazardous material requirements. This inconsistency means that, in order to sell to the largest customer base, aircraft and product manufacturers must strive to meet the most stringent hazardous substance requirements.

Laser Stripping

The last issue discussed at the SAE meeting that merits attention, is the laser stripping of wires. A presentation provided a thorough description of the laser stripping process. Laser stripping works by focusing a high-powered laser around a wire, which cuts (melts) the insulation. The amount of energy necessary to cut through the material is based on the insulation’s thickness and type. For those wires that use a composite construction (such as a polyimide-PTFE layering), the PTFE layer requires less energy to melt than the polyimide layer. As such, the laser strength has to be set to melt through the polyimide layer. In practice, this causes a superficial charring of short length to the PTFE insulation layer. Definition of the acceptable insulation charring length still needs to be determined.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. In September 2014, Michael was appointed as an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification.