View Latest Blog Entries
Close
Categories
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Management Standard & Regulation Conference & Report Maintenance & Sustainment Research Protection & Prevention Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 FAR AS50881 FAR 25.1707 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Wire System High Voltage Arcing Damage FAR 25.1709 AS4373
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
25.1701 25.1703 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems Aircraft Power System Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) arc damage Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759/87 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM F2799 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice Cable cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor Connector connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating dielectric constant Distributed Power System DO-160 Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling ethernet EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech Green Taxiing Grounding Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation ICAs IEC60172 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Insulation insulation resistance IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab Laser Marking life limited parts life projection Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 Military 5088 modeling MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 No Fault Found off gassing Outgassing Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Performance Physical Testing Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet Power systems predictive maintenance Probability of Failure Product Quality Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) relays Reliability Research Rewiring Project Risk Assessment SAE Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure Shield Shielding signal cable silver plated wire smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires stored energy supportability Sustainment Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Shock Thermal Testing Tin plated conductors Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs verification Visual Inspection white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire failure wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification work unit code

Aircraft circuit protection: A review of 5 technologies

Management Protection & Prevention

Two weeks ago we posted a blog on the selection process for circuit protection/wire pairs. Today, we produce a grid to help you understand common aircraft circuit protection types that can be found on aircraft.

The five device types talked about here are the thermal circuit protection, fuse, magnetic circuit protection, Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB), and distributed power. There may be other unique protection devices that are actively used.

Circuit protection
Circuit protection technology has come a long way in the last 20 years to improve aircraft safety

Before assessing the pros and cons of each, it is important to understand what fault conditions circuit protection devices can interrupt. Here we identify five conditions under which circuit protection devices may activate. Note: not all devices will activate under each of these conditions.

1. Short Circuit

A short circuit occurs when there is a hard short between the high voltage side and the ground or different voltage potential. Potential hazards resulting from this include overheating of wires and subsequent faults as well as damage to equipment if not properly grounded (equipment bonding). All protective devices are designed to respond to a shorting event.

2. Overload

This is where the devices in the circuit are pulling more current than the system is designed to handle (e.g. drawing 20A on a 15A circuit). Circuit protection devices, particularly analog devices, may not catch overload conditions less than 130% of the rated current. Sustained periods of overloading a circuit can lead to wire system heating and degradation of associated components.

3. Parallel Arcing

This is the most dramatic failure event and can damage the harness, nearby systems, and affect equipment functionality. With thermal or analog circuit protection, these events can last for a long time and may not event be detected.

4. Series Arcing

Series arcing is a harder event to detect because the signature from series arcing is far more subtle than parallel arcing. It can cause thermal heating and damage as well as inconsistent equipment operation.

5. Faulty Operation

This may only be detected by software-assisted circuit protection in coordination with a health monitoring system. In this fault condition, an expected set of operational characteristics are stored in the protective device system. If the powered equipment begins to operate outside of these conditions, the circuit protection may trip to protect the device from causing damage to itself or other parts of the system.

The pros and cons outlined here are based on the performance of circuit protection devices when used properly (e.g. not placing two circuit protection devices in parallel to achieve a higher rating).

Device Type Pros Cons
Thermal Circuit Protection
  • Long service history
  • Known performance
  • Thermal memory (more rapid activation of circuit protection if reset soon after opening)
  • Easily replaced
  • Functionality checks can be easily performed
  • Easy to identify when circuit protection has been activated
  • Requires a cool-down period before resetting (may be a ‘pro’ depending on your system)
  • Temperature sensitive; will take longer to trip in colder environments
  • Will not provide adequate protection from electrical arcing
Fuse
  • Fast Acting
  • Smaller profile
  • Cheapest option
  • One-time use
  • More dangerous for replacement
  • Easily damaged
  • Impossible to verify performance (once you verify that it trips, it needs to be replaced)
Magnetic Circuit Breaker
  • Can be reset without cool-down period
  • Faster Response time than thermal circuit protection
  • Response time not affected by temperature changes
  • Easy to identify when circuit protection has been activated
  • Heavier than all but distributed power type
Arc Fault Circuit Protection (AFCB), Software Controlled protection
  • Rapid Response to fault conditions
  • Still uses thermal circuit protection as backup
  • Some give indication of when arc fault has been detected
  • Easy to identify when circuit protection has been activated
  • Cannot be placed on any circuit (some circuits have electrical characteristics that can be interpreted as electrical arcing)
Distributed Power
  • Software can be set to act like thermal circuit protection or any trip curve
  • Benefits of AFCBs
  • Can be used to reduce the amount of wire used in other configurations
  • Can use solids state relays for bounceless operation and combine the circuit protection and switching devices into a single component
  • Allows for remote operation of multiple systems
  • May be combined with health monitoring system
  • Preferred for unmanned vehicles
  • Can run into problems of nuisance trips
  • Heaviest option (weight benefits improve as more circuits added)
  • Requires more planning and design time for implementation than thermal circuit protection

It is anticipated that the newest aircraft designs will continue to capitalize on the benefits of distributed power technology. This does place a new set of challenges such as determining the Electrical Wire Interconnection Systems’ (EWIS) safety and collocation of redundant/critical systems.

If you are interested in finding out more about arc damage evaluations, EWIS risk assessments, or need  help for an upcoming EWIS Service Life Assessment Project (SLEP), contact Lectromec.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components.