View Latest Blog Entries
Close
Categories
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Standard & Regulation Management Conference & Report Maintenance & Sustainment Protection & Prevention Research Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 AS50881 FAR High Voltage FAR 25.1707 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage Degradation
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
25.1701 25.1703 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems Aircraft Power System Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) arc damage Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM F2799 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conduit Connector connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating diagnostic dielectric constant Distributed Power System DO-160 Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling ethernet EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech Green Taxiing Grounding Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation ICAs IEC60172 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Insulation insulation resistance IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab Kapton Laser Marking life limited parts life projection Lightning Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 Military 5088 modeling MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 No Fault Found off gassing Outgassing Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Rewiring Project Risk Assessment SAE Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure Shield Shielding signal cable silver plated wire smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards stored energy supportability Sustainment Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Shock Thermal Testing Tin plated conductors Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs verification Visual Inspection voltage white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification work unit code

Why use Lectromec for your Testing?

Testing & Assessment

Not all testing is created equal. We have all seen the results of poorly performed tests – not only do they result in a waste of money, but also a waste of time – and when testing is delaying a product to market, the costs can be huge. Even with that in mind, it can sometimes be difficult to justify using an outside lab for testing. Today we offer the top six reasons to use an outside lab versus building capabilities in house.

ISO Certification Credentials

With any testing or analysis that is done on any product, if it is performed inside an accredited lab, the results carry a greater level of credibility. As with ISO 9000 certification of production environments, ISO 17025 certification is the verification of lab capabilities and quality management system. This quality control system ensures the accurate and repeat performance for all tests. For a look inside Lectromec’s lab, see here.

Independent Verification

Use of labs external by your organization provides the independent verification necessary to get your product noticed in the market. Take for example product specification sheets. Detailed product specification sheets often include a wide range of information. For those that have reviewed hundreds of them, occasionally claims are found that are too good to be true. If this “too good to be true” claim is only verified by the company, then the claim is often received with skepticism. However, if that information is verified by a well-known and respected third-party, then the product specification sheet carries more value with the prospective client.

Elongation Testing of Wire
It is easy to perform a test, but to perform the test correctly with attention to all of the requirements is not. Contact Lectromec to get your tests done right.

Knowledge in Testing

Product qualification testing is not something that is needed every day. Many manufacturers will perform performance tests at the initial qualification, and then potentially periodically during requalification. If it is not necessary as part of the quality control process, then the tests, which can be costly, are not performed. For those organizations that do not have constant product testing to the specific test method, the test performance knowledge is progressively lost due to the long duration between testing cycles.

By selecting an outside lab for these tests, you are going to an organization that regularly performs these tests. Since the lab performs these tests for multiple manufacturers, there is a high level of certainty that the test is performed correctly and in alignment with industry expectations. Test data is useless if not gathered correctly.

Avoid Capital Investments

As identified above, if the test is executed infrequently, then the equipment use will also be limited. Lectromec has seen facilities with test equipment idle greater than 99% of the time. Then when the equipment is needed, the equipment needs to be examined, potentially fixed, then calibrated and verified to ensure original performance conformity. Then after this spin up period, the testing can finally be performed.

By going with an outside lab such as Lectromec, you can avoid this capital investment and overall waste of time necessary to keep the equipment up and running.

Avoid Knowledge Loss

The frequency of testing has a significant impact on test performance. Even in Lectromec’s lab where testing is regularly performed, ramp up is necessary for infrequently performed tests. Consider your own organization and some of the product qualification tests; When was the last time that certain tests were performed? Is the person who performed the test still with the organization?

Avoid this issue by getting your tests performed at a lab with staff is regularly cross trained on the equipment and test procedures.

Cost

It could be argued that if you have the capital equipment and the available labor, then performing the test internally is a sunk cost. The problem is that by doing the test, your personnel is being diverted from the one thing that makes them the most productive. Furthermore, because Lectromec specializes in this area and has a streamlined process for performance, Lectromec is likely the cheaper option than to perform it internally.

Assessing your Needs

It is unlikely that all six of the reasons presented here apply to your organization’s needs. However, if at least two reasons resonate, contact Lectromec. We will be happy to review your needs and provide you with a quote for your one-time or ongoing test needs.

We look forward to working with you on your next product qualification/assessment.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. In September 2014, Michael was appointed as an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification.