View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Management Standard & Regulation Conference & Report Maintenance & Sustainment Protection & Prevention Research Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 FAR AS50881 FAR 25.1707 High Voltage Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Wire System Maintenance Arcing Damage FAR 25.1709
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
25.1701 25.1703 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems Aircraft Power System Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) arc damage Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM F2799 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conduit Connector connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating diagnostic dielectric constant Distributed Power System DO-160 Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling ethernet EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech Green Taxiing Grounding Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation ICAs IEC60172 Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Insulation insulation resistance IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab Kapton Laser Marking life limited parts life projection Lightning Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 Military 5088 modeling MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 No Fault Found off gassing Outgassing Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Rewiring Project Risk Assessment SAE Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure Shield Shielding signal cable silver plated wire smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires stored energy supportability Sustainment Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Shock Thermal Testing Tin plated conductors Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs verification Visual Inspection voltage white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification work unit code
Key Takeaways
  • An aircraft’s electrical wiring interconnection system (EWIS) goes beyond wire harnesses, but includes much of the supporting equipment.
  • The EWIS does include engine wire harnesses.
  • Modification of the EWIS does require impact analysis – the first step to understanding the impact is the with the wThe longevity of wiring system components is reduced with higher-voltage/higher-frequency applications.

Having well-defined and recognized system boundaries is the best means to ensure an analysis of that system is robust and does not leave any analysis gaps. Without an established limit and assigned responsibilities, arguments will ensue as to who is the responsible party and time/effort will be wasted with duplicated analysis.

Because an aircraft’s wiring touches nearly all of the systems, it can be confusing to understand where the system starts and stops, and this has led to confusion as to the responsible party for the wiring system design and/or maintenance. Some organizations have seen the responsibility fall on the electrical power systems teams, others, avionics. Regardless of who takes up the responsibility, a clear definition of the wiring system’s physical and logical boundaries must be agreed upon. Thankfully, there are several industry documents that can be relied upon.

Starting with the FAA definition

According to 25.1701(a), the electrical wiring interconnection system (EWIS) is, “any wire, wiring device, or combination of these, including termination devices, installed in any area of the airplane for the purpose of transmitting electrical energy, including data and signals, between two or more intended termination points.”

The FAA definition then goes on to list several wiring system components that are included in the EWIS definition, of particular interest is section A14 that states, “EWIS components inside shelves, panels, racks, junction boxes, distribution panels, and back-planes of equipment racks, including, but not limited to, circuit board back-planes, wire integration units, and external wiring of equipment.” From a top-level view, the statement suggests that any wiring that is not specifically located inside of equipment boxes not used for distribution are part of the EWIS.

Engines, Nacelles, and APUs

One area of contention during the original rule definition with the FAA is wiring harnesses attached to engines, nacelles, and APUs. As identified in the disposition of comments, the FAA identified that GE, Honeywell, and AIA/GAMA commented that engine, nacelle, and APUs wiring should be exempt from the EWIS certification and maintenance requirements. Specifically, the wiring in these areas is very robust and that the existing regulations (those in existence prior to the EWIS regulations released in 2007) were adequate.

High Voltage Arcing on Aircraft
When some think of EWIS, they think of the wiring harnesses. But there is a lot more that falls into the boundaries of EWIS.

In response to this, the FAA cited the Lauda Air incident report. “Investigation of the accident disclosed that certain ‘‘hot-short’’ conditions involving the electrical system occurring during an auto-restow command, could potentially cause the DCV to momentarily move to the deploy position.”

As such, the FAA views the wiring within the engines, nacelles, and APU is part of the EWIS and is subject to the same requirements as other areas of the aircraft where EWIS is installed.


Other industry documents follow similar thoughts when considering the aircraft EWIS boundaries. The SAE document on EWIS installation, AS50881, pertains to, “wiring inside of airborne electronic equipment, but shall apply to wiring externally attached to such equipment.”

Reviewing the AS 50881 as a whole suggests that the standard believes in the same physical/logical EWIS boundaries as identified in the FAA’s guidance and regulatory requirements. The AS 50881 specifically states that wiring stops at LRUs and there are several sections that referred to the wiring attached to or routed near nacelles, engines, and APUs.


The fact is, nearly all parts of the aircraft where wiring is routed from one piece of equipment to another require some level of EWIS evaluation. This means, until wireless power transmission because viable, the EWIS will need to be assessed for every system. Every LRU added to a vehicle, every additional antenna, every rework of the in-flight entertainment (IFE) system, will require an EWIS impact analysis.

The EWIS analysis depth and breadth will vary from project to project, just like any other system assessment. In some cases, the impact may require unpopular changes to be made. This may require additional routing or more complicated routing in order to avoid and maintain separation distance from critical systems. The analysis might point to additional secondary harness protection to protect from maintenance actions. The number of factors it goes into a properly designed and safe EWIS is rather extensive (the AS 50881 is a 124-page document for a reason).

Final Review

If wiring is outside of a piece of equipment, then there is a strong chance it is part of an aircraft’s electrical wiring interconnect system. As with every other part of aircraft design, overhaul, and maintenance, how each EWIS component is selected, designed, installed, maintained must be documented. For those seeking FAA certification, adherence to best practices established by the industry and following the latest EWIS regulations is the only way to achieve compliance.

For those looking for EWIS compliance or certification assistance, contact Lectromec. Our experience, lab capabilities, and software tools are a great resource for anyone looking to expedite their EWIS certification.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. Michael is an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification and the chairman of the SAE AE-8A EWIS installation committee.