View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Standard & Regulation Management Conference & Report Maintenance & Sustainment Research Protection & Prevention Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 AS50881 FAR High Voltage FAR 25.1707 AS4373 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
25.1701 25.1703 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems AIR6808 Aircraft Power System Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) arc damage Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM F2696 ASTM F2799 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conductors conduit Connector connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating diagnostic dielectric constant disinfectant Distributed Power System DO-160 dynamic cut through E-CFR Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling ethernet EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS sustainment EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech Green Taxiing Grounding hand sanitizer Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation ICAs IEC60172 IEEE Instructions for Continued Airworthiness Insulation insulation resistance IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab Kapton Laser Marking life limited parts Life prediction life projection Lightning maintainability Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel measurement Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 Military 5088 modeling MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 No Fault Found off gassing Outgassing Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Rewiring Project Risk Assessment SAE Sanitizing Fluids Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure Shield Shielding signal cable silver plated wire smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards stored energy supportability Sustainment Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Shock Thermal Testing Tin plated conductors Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs USAF verification Visual Inspection voltage white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code

The scope of chafing on aircraft wire and its impact on wire reliability

Aging Wires & Systems Maintenance & Sustainment

Wire chafing can have an impact on wire reliability. The U.S. Navy found as part of a review for the allocation of labor and general wiring practices, roughly $94 million is spent annually in time and materials for the removal of equipment due to undiagnosed wiring problems. This is often referred to as equipment being returned ‘No Fault Found’ or NFF. One simple reason for this is a device is often more readily accessible to maintenance personnel. Wires that connect to a device may come from various points throughout the aircraft, and some may be in hard-to-inspect areas. Further, devices tend to have higher failure rates than wires, so it is not irrational for the first assumption to be that the problem is the device.

wire reliability

Given the ever growing use of electrical systems on aircraft and the growing complexity of the wiring systems, there is no question why the U.S. Navy projects that between 1 and 4 million man hours a year are spent trouble shooting, isolating, and locating wiring faults. This corresponds to a significant amount of time, beyond scheduled and preventive maintenance, that an aircraft is not mission capable. The NAVAIR research suggests that there is nearly as many hours spent on unscheduled maintenance as on scheduled maintenance.

Introduction of EWIS Concepts

For a number of years now, the U.S. Navy has placed significant emphasis on Electrical Wire Interconnection Systems (EWIS). The above pie chart shows the wire system failure modes for Navy aircraft from 1980 – 1999. One of the main areas of concern that emerges is that chafing contributed to more than a third of all wire failures. Whether against structure, devices, or other wire harnesses, the wearing down and eventual breech of a wire’s insulation by chafing presents a significant hazard to EWIS.

wire degradation

In spite of the fact that chafing is a known problem and the tools to resolve the issue are available, analysis of data from years 2000 – 2004 wire failures modes on Navy aircraft showed that chafing remained the leader of all wire failure modes.

If you are interested in wire reliability, you may want to read Lectromec’s Improving Wire Reliability by Understanding Arcing v.s Protection Schemes article.

The Problem in Commercial Aircraft

Though the commercial aviation industry experiences many of the same problems as the armed services, much of the data are not recorded and\or reported publicly from commercial aircraft. Perhaps the most comprehensive data available on the commercial fleet comes from the inspections mandated by the FAA on B737’s back in 1998. These inspections directed operators to evaluate chafing on fuel system wiring, the results of which showed that more than half of the operational 737 fleet contained wires which had some degree of chafing.

wire degradation

Part of the chafing problem can be handled with the use of clamp standoffs, which should be considered the primary means of reducing the chance for a wire harness to rub against structure. In areas such as at bulkheads where clamps are not practical, chafing tape and tubing should be employed to minimize the potential for chafing.

Though clamps are recommended as the first technique for reducing chafing, they are among the most common locations for chafing to occur. Whether it is due to excessive force during maintenance or flight, the cumulative effect of weight on the wire harness, or by loosening of the connection from structure, the misalignment of clamps significantly increases the potential for chafing by creating pressure points on the wires. Periodic inspections of these for alignment can prove effective for curtailing wire insulation fatigue and chafing.

From an aircraft level perspective, the potential risks created from chafing must be considered prior to installation or modification. Higher vibration zones are likely to contribute to more rapid degradation if not properly addressed. How these components are tested and verified is critical to selecting to the safe and reliable flight of the aircraft. Contact Lectromec to find out more about how we can test and verify your design.

Michael Traskos

This article was written by the Lectromec technical team. Aircraft wiring is our passion and we strive to make a contribution to the field by sharing our expertise through blogs, podcasts, and videos. We hope you find this information helpful. We also encourage you to submit comments and spur discussions.